waitin_toolong
07-18 07:25 PM
you are correct .
You can file AOS for her mention both her current H4 status and also inxclude a copy of H1 notice just in case
You can file AOS for her mention both her current H4 status and also inxclude a copy of H1 notice just in case
wallpaper Tamera Mowry Pregnant
raysaikat
07-08 10:39 PM
but we sent out the application package on June 28 (Friday) and the USCIS received our package on July 1st (Based on the Fedex tracking record). There is no way that my employer can refer to the new prevailing wage databse, which is released on July 1st.
Well, technically your employer is not supposed to set the wage based on the prevailing wage (or any other immigration related number). Your wage should be based on the job you perform.
Well, technically your employer is not supposed to set the wage based on the prevailing wage (or any other immigration related number). Your wage should be based on the job you perform.
aachoo
02-03 01:44 AM
Dont flll 1040 by yourself if you are not a tax expert.
Line 34 in 1040 is tuition and fee deduction and you have to file form 8917.
get Some software such as Turbotax or Taxcut
Are you serious? I must be a super expert on taxes because I have always done it on paper using a calculator for the last 14 years and counting. Just spend an hour reading the instructions and you're done. Have a question, call the IRS. Unlike other government agencies (cough.. USCIS cough..) the agents at the other end of the line are actually helpful and responsive.
-a
Line 34 in 1040 is tuition and fee deduction and you have to file form 8917.
get Some software such as Turbotax or Taxcut
Are you serious? I must be a super expert on taxes because I have always done it on paper using a calculator for the last 14 years and counting. Just spend an hour reading the instructions and you're done. Have a question, call the IRS. Unlike other government agencies (cough.. USCIS cough..) the agents at the other end of the line are actually helpful and responsive.
-a
2011 images 2011 Tia Mowry Pregnant
kishdam
02-22 10:17 AM
Hi,
I know there has been lot of discussions on things to do and not to do after changing jobs - but seems like there is no definitive conclusion. Thought of getting opinion on following:
(i) Generally people suggest to send G28 to change the lawyer representation - this helps in tracking what is going on without missing any RFE's.
(ii) Regarding AC21 letter informing USCIS there are contradicting advice even from lawyers - some say that dont do anything until they issue an RFE. Thinking here is that we would attract USCIS attention by sending an AC21 letter that could potentially delay. By not sending the letter they might just approve without any questions.
Based on this, I initially thought of sending just G28 but not AC21 letter. But once we send G28 to change lawyer representation, my application get USCIS's attention anyway - so I am thinking why not send AC21 letter as well as a back up.
Any opinions?
Thanks.
I know there has been lot of discussions on things to do and not to do after changing jobs - but seems like there is no definitive conclusion. Thought of getting opinion on following:
(i) Generally people suggest to send G28 to change the lawyer representation - this helps in tracking what is going on without missing any RFE's.
(ii) Regarding AC21 letter informing USCIS there are contradicting advice even from lawyers - some say that dont do anything until they issue an RFE. Thinking here is that we would attract USCIS attention by sending an AC21 letter that could potentially delay. By not sending the letter they might just approve without any questions.
Based on this, I initially thought of sending just G28 but not AC21 letter. But once we send G28 to change lawyer representation, my application get USCIS's attention anyway - so I am thinking why not send AC21 letter as well as a back up.
Any opinions?
Thanks.
more...
sanju_dba
03-10 01:55 PM
It is really funny. I guess no amount of me explaining about soft LUD would help. People will still track them and waste their time.
You can always add corrections, You are the Admin!
You can always add corrections, You are the Admin!
sweet_jungle
11-13 12:33 AM
Has anybody tried getting an FP by walking in at an ASC? If you have waited really long enough, will the ASC entertain you if you produce them the I-485 receipts?
more...
Jimi_Hendrix
12-14 03:47 PM
You have a valid point and I hope that IV planners take note of this.
2010 Tia Mowry#39;s pregnant baby bump
neglur
10-02 10:19 PM
My 485 application was recieved by R.Cook@NSC too and no receipts or checks cashed yet. My application was delivered on July 18'th. My I-140 was approved on May 11'th 2007 by TSC.
more...
desitechie
06-03 06:17 PM
My current AP expires on 2 Aug 2009. I applied for renewal on 2 May and it was approved on the 20th. But the validity is only till 19 may 2010 and not 2 aug 2010.
I have lost almost 3 months here. Is it normal or a special case that i need to call USCIS?
Please advise.
Thanks
I have lost almost 3 months here. Is it normal or a special case that i need to call USCIS?
Please advise.
Thanks
hair tattoo tia mowry pregnant with
dixie
12-18 10:43 AM
Neither can I. By the way, it is notable that the Princeton event came bang in the middle of our big push in Washington during the fag end of the LD session. Wonder if any of the core members could make it to the event given how critical that particular week end was to us.
more...
validIV
03-24 08:10 PM
When is my 485 getting approved?
hot Tia Mowry Films New Pregnancy
puvathoor
04-11 11:59 AM
I think if one is in hell, USCIS can hand deliver..
Heaven is another Story (storey?).. :-)
But as a recent believer in buddhist ideals, I think I will just be a cow in my next life..
That brings up a good point.. as a cow, it would be a bad life for me in USA.. India would be much better bet.. I would be worshipped and rarely eaten.. hmm.. Thinking ahead of the curve, I think I will apply for a "cow green card" for India.. Cows will be clamouring to get to India.. I will be mooing away soon..
Heaven is another Story (storey?).. :-)
But as a recent believer in buddhist ideals, I think I will just be a cow in my next life..
That brings up a good point.. as a cow, it would be a bad life for me in USA.. India would be much better bet.. I would be worshipped and rarely eaten.. hmm.. Thinking ahead of the curve, I think I will apply for a "cow green card" for India.. Cows will be clamouring to get to India.. I will be mooing away soon..
more...
house tia mowry pregnant belly. tia
Abhishika
12-13 06:32 AM
Hi All,
For the 140 appln we see that all service centers except TSC takes more than 6 months. TSC has a processing time frame of 6 months for 140
where as NSC and CSC says they are processing 140 of Sep/jan 2006.
We pay same fee for USCIS at all offices. This is a descrimination based on
USCIS location. If 140 is approved and 485 is pending we have flexibility of changing the jobs.
(ie if you had applied at NSC, then u will not get this flexibility)
Most of the guys who applied at TSC during July 07 got the approval of 140 where as NSC and CSC are still processing 2006.
(Mine was filed at TSC and on the 5th month got transferred to NSC.
Now should it follow 6months of TSC processing time or go to the storage cabin and wait till the processing date at NSC comes to current?)
So should we complain to ombudsman, to make the processing time similar at all the offices. If there is a difference of one months is OK but not more than one month.
I would like to hear everyones opinion especially those who stuck at NSC and CSC.
Thank You
Abhishika
For the 140 appln we see that all service centers except TSC takes more than 6 months. TSC has a processing time frame of 6 months for 140
where as NSC and CSC says they are processing 140 of Sep/jan 2006.
We pay same fee for USCIS at all offices. This is a descrimination based on
USCIS location. If 140 is approved and 485 is pending we have flexibility of changing the jobs.
(ie if you had applied at NSC, then u will not get this flexibility)
Most of the guys who applied at TSC during July 07 got the approval of 140 where as NSC and CSC are still processing 2006.
(Mine was filed at TSC and on the 5th month got transferred to NSC.
Now should it follow 6months of TSC processing time or go to the storage cabin and wait till the processing date at NSC comes to current?)
So should we complain to ombudsman, to make the processing time similar at all the offices. If there is a difference of one months is OK but not more than one month.
I would like to hear everyones opinion especially those who stuck at NSC and CSC.
Thank You
Abhishika
tattoo makeup Tia and Tamera Mowry Spotted tia mowry pregnant pictures.
shreekhand
02-22 08:41 PM
After Employment Green Card wait 5 years.
After Family Green Card wait 3 years only
Why?
Why Family Green Card less wait time?
not true.
And it is 3 years for spouses starts after 2 years of conditional residence
Again, incorrect.
It is is 5 years for all Family based except marriage to US Citizen (where it is 3 years).
It is NOT 3 years after conditional residence - It is a total of 3 years.
Go check USCIS publication M-476 to enlighten yourselves.
After Family Green Card wait 3 years only
Why?
Why Family Green Card less wait time?
not true.
And it is 3 years for spouses starts after 2 years of conditional residence
Again, incorrect.
It is is 5 years for all Family based except marriage to US Citizen (where it is 3 years).
It is NOT 3 years after conditional residence - It is a total of 3 years.
Go check USCIS publication M-476 to enlighten yourselves.
more...
pictures tia mowry pregnant photos.
Pagal
04-29 07:47 AM
Hello,
Travisa SF is a small setup ... there is one lady who manages the show (and she may have an asst or two). Your best option is to visit their office in downtown ... somewhere near Market St, I remember.
I had good experience with them for UK visa a few years ago ... good luck!
Travisa SF is a small setup ... there is one lady who manages the show (and she may have an asst or two). Your best option is to visit their office in downtown ... somewhere near Market St, I remember.
I had good experience with them for UK visa a few years ago ... good luck!
dresses Photos: Tia Mowry#39;s Baby
kannan
11-17 04:51 PM
My I 94 was valid only till Feb 20 . I am worried now will it be a problem ?
more...
makeup tia mowry pregnant photos.
starscream
06-06 10:29 AM
Below is a decsription of this amendment from AILA document which lists all the amendments that were discussed yesterday
http://www.aila.org/content/default.aspx?docid=22584
It confirms that the amendment #1231 applies to Y visa only. On the Senate discussion thread yesterday when this amedment was being discussed some body mentioned something along the lines that that Sen. Kennedy said he supported employer recruitment for all jobs and that really scared me ... I think Sen. Kennedy might have been referring to jobs that require the Y visa
This amendment does not mention anything on H1Bs. There was a lot of discussion on this point yesterday. I think we can breathe a litlle easy now.
The CIR does have other restrictions on H1B like $5000 more fees, restrictions for consulting companies & non-disaplacement clause but I don't think any GC type LABOR CERTIFICATION is required.
From the aila doc:
Durbin Amendment (#1231) to Remove DOL-Determined Labor Shortages as an Exception to Y Visa Recruitment Requirements
Senator Durbin (D-IL) introduced an amendment that eliminates DOL-determined labor shortages as an exception to employer recruitment requirements for Y visas. Senator Durbin argued that the amendment is an attempt to require that jobs be offered to Americans before they are offered to Y visa holders in the new worker program. Removing the provision in the underlying bill allowing the Secretary of Labor to declare labor shortages, he said, would achieve this, since all employers who use the Y visa program would always be required to offer jobs to Americans first. Senator Durbin cited the AFL-CIO as a strong supporter of his measure. Senator Grassley (R-IA), a co-sponsor of the amendment, also expressed his support for the amendment.
Senator Specter argued in response that this amendment is simply unnecessary, since American workers and their wages are already protected under the law. Senator Kennedy, however, expressed support for the amendment. He agreed with the general principle that a measure protecting American workers is good for the country. Ensuring that new Y visa workers don’t encroach upon American jobs or affect American wages, he said, is a step in that direction.
The amendment was agreed to by a vote of 71-22.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.aila.org/content/default.aspx?docid=22584
It confirms that the amendment #1231 applies to Y visa only. On the Senate discussion thread yesterday when this amedment was being discussed some body mentioned something along the lines that that Sen. Kennedy said he supported employer recruitment for all jobs and that really scared me ... I think Sen. Kennedy might have been referring to jobs that require the Y visa
This amendment does not mention anything on H1Bs. There was a lot of discussion on this point yesterday. I think we can breathe a litlle easy now.
The CIR does have other restrictions on H1B like $5000 more fees, restrictions for consulting companies & non-disaplacement clause but I don't think any GC type LABOR CERTIFICATION is required.
From the aila doc:
Durbin Amendment (#1231) to Remove DOL-Determined Labor Shortages as an Exception to Y Visa Recruitment Requirements
Senator Durbin (D-IL) introduced an amendment that eliminates DOL-determined labor shortages as an exception to employer recruitment requirements for Y visas. Senator Durbin argued that the amendment is an attempt to require that jobs be offered to Americans before they are offered to Y visa holders in the new worker program. Removing the provision in the underlying bill allowing the Secretary of Labor to declare labor shortages, he said, would achieve this, since all employers who use the Y visa program would always be required to offer jobs to Americans first. Senator Durbin cited the AFL-CIO as a strong supporter of his measure. Senator Grassley (R-IA), a co-sponsor of the amendment, also expressed his support for the amendment.
Senator Specter argued in response that this amendment is simply unnecessary, since American workers and their wages are already protected under the law. Senator Kennedy, however, expressed support for the amendment. He agreed with the general principle that a measure protecting American workers is good for the country. Ensuring that new Y visa workers don’t encroach upon American jobs or affect American wages, he said, is a step in that direction.
The amendment was agreed to by a vote of 71-22.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
girlfriend 2010 TAMERA MOWRY PREGNANT
iman.karta
12-27 04:20 PM
test
hairstyles hot tia mowry pregnant photos.
desanar
04-05 01:15 PM
I found that there are 24 states under compact member, some does not requires SSN to get RN license so there are good states to get license and practices. *https://www.ncsbn.org/158.htm *However you still get stuck when it comes to sponsorship.
roseball
07-22 12:03 PM
Hi
My H1 is due for extension this year end.
Valid period of H1 remaining is 1 1/2 year since extension
I understand that H1 extension has to go through the rigorous procedure nowadays.
It needs client letter stating that project will last for 1 year.
Getting such letter is not possible.
So having I140 approved makes thing easy for H1 extension? Or same process for h1 extension is followed
Please reply
Thanks
Abbey
Having I-140 approved only makes you eligible for a 3 yr extension, provided you submit all the documents required in normal H1 process. So, you still have to go through the same process.
My H1 is due for extension this year end.
Valid period of H1 remaining is 1 1/2 year since extension
I understand that H1 extension has to go through the rigorous procedure nowadays.
It needs client letter stating that project will last for 1 year.
Getting such letter is not possible.
So having I140 approved makes thing easy for H1 extension? Or same process for h1 extension is followed
Please reply
Thanks
Abbey
Having I-140 approved only makes you eligible for a 3 yr extension, provided you submit all the documents required in normal H1 process. So, you still have to go through the same process.
raysaikat
01-14 02:18 AM
If you do get the F-1 visa, then you likely would not face any difficulty at the airport. However, F-1 visa requires non-immigration intent, which would be very difficult, if not impossible, for you to prove. Unfortunately, even J-1 visa requires you to prove non-immigration intent. So if you go outside USA, very likely you will not be able to get back. Therefore, I believe that traveling in your state is not advisable; you should stay put until your children's father is in a position to marry you. Then you can obtain the fiancee visa (K-1) and travel abroad.
No comments:
Post a Comment